Contact
  • Categories
  • Categories

    My Space, Your Business – When Things Go Wrong in a Commercial Tenancy – Part 1

    A concerned man in a suit sits at a kitchen counter, reviewing a document with a shocked expression, surrounded by scattered bills, a calculator, coins, and a wallet. The Merovitz Potechin LLP logo and the tagline "The referred to law firm" appear in the image, emphasizing commercial lease termination in Ontario. The setting suggests a legal or financial issue related to tenancy disputes or lease agreements. The background features a modern kitchen with a kettle and green-themed décor.

    Everything doesn’t always go according to plan. Whether you’re a landlord maintaining a building or a tenant trying to operate a business, adequate preparation saves time and money. A carefully-drafted lease under the Ontario Commercial Tenancies Act (the “Act”) can help you anticipate disputes and provide a roadmap to avoid them.

    Design Your Deal: The Act’s Permissive Power

    The Act is fundamentally permissive, granting both landlords and tenants the flexibility to tailor their lease agreements to meet specific needs. The Act provides a framework and serves as a guide, allowing parties the freedom to structure their lease in a way that suits their unique circumstances. This flexibility allows landlords and tenants to customize most terms of a lease, including rent adjustments, maintenance responsibilities, and specific business requirements.

    However, it’s important to note that there are key areas where the Act imposes mandatory provisions to protect the rights of both parties. Understanding these nuances can help you craft a lease that is not only legally sound but aligned with your business goals.

    That being said, there are a couple of areas where the parties are not free and the Act may override to offer protection in specific scenarios. For example, the Act will override a negotiated lease to provide the following:

    1. Reasonable Notice for Breach: Where tenants fail to live up to the terms of a lease, landlords must provide them with reasonable notice — an opportunity to make things right, either by “curing” or fixing the breach or default,  or by reasonably compensating the landlord in money.
    2. Tenant Rights: No matter what a lease might say, tenants or sub-tenants will always retain the right to seek relief from the courts.
    3. Distraint Rights: The Act outlines very particular requirements relating to how landlords may seize a tenant’s property for unpaid rent, balancing landlord rights with tenant protections.

    So long as a commercial lease sets out certain minimums relating to notice, however, the terms of a commercial lease will be determinative on most issues.

    Can Landlords Lock Tenants Out?

    Like most legal questions, the short answer is “it depends.” Namely, the landlord’s intentions and the circumstances leading up to the lock change determine the outcome.

    Landlords may change locks in two primary scenarios: to terminate the lease or to secure property.

    1. To Terminate the Lease

    Landlords may “re-enter” and terminate a lease under specific circumstances, including:

    Non-Payment of Rent:

    • The Act permits landlords to repossess a property if rent remains unpaid for 15 days after it’s due. In such cases, no formal demand for rent is necessary, and landlords may establish possession by changing the locks.

    Breach of Lease Terms:

    • If tenants violate lease provisions other than rent payment, landlords must provide “reasonable notice” and allow an opportunity to resolve the issue or provide monetary compensation. If no resolution or compensation is forthcoming, the lease may be subject to termination and the landlord may change the locks to retake possession of the premises in a process called “re-entry”.

    Illegal Use of the Premises:

    • The Act also allows landlords to terminate a lease where a tenant is convicted of certain crimes. For example:
      • Operating a “disorderly house” (e.g. an unlicensed betting establishment) within the leased premises.)
      • Similarly, carrying out a trade or business requiring a license without obtaining or maintaining that license may lead to termination. This includes activities covered under the Municipal Act, 2001 or the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

    It may seem like common sense, but tenants must ensure they are abiding by all laws and licensing requirements, or their leases may be forfeit. Sounds simple enough, right?

    Process matters. It is critical that landlords terminating a lease strictly adhere to the requirements of the Act. Failure to follow the proper procedures while seeking to protect their rights can result in complex issues; fertile ground for time-consuming and costly litigation. Where problems arise in the termination of a commercial lease, landlords may be faced with both the expense of resolving the issue and facing opportunity costs, stuck unable to lease their space to a new tenant until issues with the previous tenant are resolved.

    When considering termination of a lease, it pays to have advice on how to do so properly, in line with the Act, and be informed as to what other options might be available. Terminating the lease may not be the best option.

    Coming Up in Part 2

    In some cases, landlords may change locks not to terminate a lease but to secure property. In Part 2, we’ll explore how this process works and what happens during distraint.

    The content on this website is for information purposes only and is not legal advice, which cannot be given without knowing the facts of a specific situation. You should never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. The use of the website does not establish a solicitor and client relationship. If you would like to discuss your specific legal needs with us, please contact our office at 613-563-7544 and one of our lawyers will be happy to assist you.

    Posted By: Maxim Piva of Merovitz Potechin LLP

    Associate

    Maxim is an associate with Merovitz Potechin’s Business and Corporate Group. He represents clients in all aspects of corporate formation, governance, and commercial transactions including M&A transactions, and reorganizations.

    Maxim earned his JD from the University of Ottawa before being called to the bar in 2022 and entering legal practice in Cornwall, primarily in corporate law, residential real estate, and wills. He is thrilled to have joined Merovitz Potechin’s Business and Corporate Group and be able to bring his practice to Ottawa.

    Maxim rarely misses a chance to enjoy taking time on the water with his paddleboard or spending time with friends camping throughout Ontario.

    [...]